QUOTE
1. Every team to have a minimum of 8 players of colour in
their 30 man squad
2. All of these 8 players must be given reasonable game time - monitored weekly by the national selectors
3. The status quo of two black wingers is no longer acceptable
4. A minimum of 4 players of colour must be in every match 22
5. At all times, 2 players of colour must be on the field[/b]
2. All of these 8 players must be given reasonable game time - monitored weekly by the national selectors
3. The status quo of two black wingers is no longer acceptable
4. A minimum of 4 players of colour must be in every match 22
5. At all times, 2 players of colour must be on the field[/b]
According to the Collins dictionary a quota system can be
defined as a system which limits or promotes certain shares over others.
Investorwords defines a quota system as being system based on hiring or
admissions policies requiring a set percentage of a minority group to be hired
or admitted. I will be using the that quota system set for the Vodacom Cup in
South Africa next year, to argue that excluding players in favour of others is
not the answer .
Image taken from: The South African Rugby union, (SARU), will reintroduce the
controversial racial quota system in one of its domestic rugby competitions
next year. Vodacom Cup teams will have to pick at least seven in their squads
with at least five playing at a time. According to Gerald Imray, SARU feels
that South Africa hasn’t made progress in changing rugby in South Africa. SARU
President Oregan Hoskins argues that this system will be a critical step in
transforming rugby, which was originally historically restricted for whites;
and had been related to the racist apartheid regime. What SARU has not realised
is that the system was already tried in 1994, and then canned as it was seen as
‘window dressing. This is correct as a quota system is not a sufficient
solution given it will still exclude players.
South Africa was first introduced to rugby through the University of Stellenbosch. It was here that rugby was played first, and only
played by young Afrikaner men. As rugby became a strong part of Afrikaner
student culture, rugby had transformed into a salient feature at Stellenbosch.
Unfortunately with the rise of Afrikaner nationalism during the 1930s and the
1940s, rugby had become a pro Afrikaner Cultural expression (Booth, 2010).
As a result, Rugby was only part of one ethnic group. Nauright,(1996) agrees by
saying some Afrikaners/whites tried asserting their historical cultural values
and beliefs as opposed to embarking on a path towards cultural assimilation for
the new South Africa. After South Africa had won the 1995 Rugby World Cup, it
was clear that the white administrations that still controlled key roles in the
new unified SARU actually had little interest in the development of rugby in the
black communities. Many of the
development programmes were little more than showpieces for the
International community (Black & Nauright, 1998).
According to Alison Donnelly, SARU has been involved in
creating a new initiative for South African women’s rugby. Mahlubi Puzi, SARU
Manager for women’s rugby, claims that programmes will be made to help develop
women’s rugby. This will see several workshops and training sessions to help
develop coaches and players in more remote rural areas of South Africa.
According to Puzi, the sharing of rugby knowledge is pivotal for female
players, coaches and administrators. This is an attempt to fill in a gap by
concentrating on applying proper training methods to assist methods; skills;
drills; fitness; conditioning and nutrition. The question has to be asked as to
why SARU isn’t doing the same for black communities in general, for males who
may also not have accessibility as well as facilities to be able to play rugby
as opposed to resorting to making it through quota system.
According to Sekar, (2009) the controversial quota system
was essential for cricket developing in South Africa. Sekar described it as
being positive discrimination against negative discrimination which denied any
non-white players the chance to compete on merit, as well as seeing a quota
system restoring balance on an even playing field. ‘They also forget that the
previous quota system not only excluded non-white talent, but also forced an
exodus of white and mixed race talent too’.
Rugby unions should focus on development programmes, instead
of racially discriminating against certain players by means of a quota system,”Kriel said. A quota system based on race will not develop new players, because
institutions and provinces merely import black players, who are already playing
the game, in order to comply with quota requirements. A rugby forum who was
made aware of the decision also brought forth a good argument: ‘They create
doubt in players minds on weather they should be there or not, and
disadvantages white players who may be better than one of the black players but
isn't selected because of the colour of his skin.’
What can be learnt through this argument, is that while many
may feel that the quota system will restore some sense of balance, the fact
remains that excluding any players because of their race to promote others is
not the way to moving forward. There are deeper issues such as the development
of rugby as a whole in black communities. Given the history, it is
understandable that many feel disenchanted with the lure of rugby; given that
it was historically a white’s game. Just like women’s rugby, SARU needs to
develop rugby at school level and in rural areas where access is a barrier.
Even for those who have no interest in rugby, they should not dismiss this
argument, because rugby is integral to the social formation and import to many
cultures. A sport such as rugby can break existing barriers within a society,
but not through another quota system.
Reference list:
Booth, D. (2003). Hitting Apartheid for Six? The Politics of the South African Sports Boycott. Journal of Contemporary History July 1, 38:3, 477-493. DOI: 10.1177/101269029603100104
Boost for South African women's rugby. (2011, March 24). ScrumQueens, (n.p). Retrieved from http://www.scrumqueens.com/features/boost-south-african-womens-rugby
Nauright, J. (1996). A Besieged Tribe?: Nostalgia, White Cultural Identity and the Role of Rugby in a changing South Africa. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 31: 69. DOI: 10.1177/101269029603100104
South African rugby to return to racial quotas. (2013, April 15). The New Zealand Herald, (n.p). Retrieved from http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=10912707
The International Journal of the History of Sport.(1994).Playing for power? rugby,Afrikaner nationalism and masculinity in South Africa, c.1900–70. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523369408713871
Hyperlinks:
I:Hitting Aparthied for Six
II: ScrumQueens
III: Besieged Tribe
IV: NZ Herald
V: Playing for Power?
VI: AfriForum
VII: First Quota System
VIII: Disadvantage
IX: Rugby Forum
X: Vodacom Cup
I:Hitting Aparthied for Six
II: ScrumQueens
III: Besieged Tribe
IV: NZ Herald
V: Playing for Power?
VI: AfriForum
VII: First Quota System
VIII: Disadvantage
IX: Rugby Forum
X: Vodacom Cup



So hold up a second, are they making it so you have to have x players of 'colour' in the squad?
ReplyDeleteIs this to squash racism or something? Because all they're really doing is pointing out that it still exists.
Correct, and also it's not known what is classified as a "black" player, so if you're half-kast that is light skin you'll be set to miss out as well as being brown as a result of mixed race may not cut it as being a black player. Yeah it's a double standard really, excluding players which doesn't help solve the problem.
DeleteThat is a little ridiculous, very surprising insight! So assuming, because this has apparently been the traditional way of going about the pickings, it is considered acceptable and not entirely addressed? Kind of sad to be honest! Anyway, great blog!
DeleteIt's like at high school when they poach players from low decile schools to play to First Fifteens at private schools. But in real life. While I'm all for the advancement of the little guy, at some point they have to acknowledge that just because someone is 'black' doesn't mean he needs a hand up and also his ethnicity doesn't necessarily mean he's any better or worse at a sport than someone of another race. Rugby is confusing enough as it is...
ReplyDelete